Perhaps I can be considered a rara avis by technology standards. I relish technologies, but resist getting the latest and greatest. I have consistently opted for lesser popular products which better met my needs.
![]() |
Corel WordPerfect |
As for computers, I have almost always been a Microsoft user (but I got my start on “Trash-80s” and I vaguely remember CMS OS). I have loaded a flavor of Linux on a desktop but I have not be inspired to play with it, since software tinkering is not a desired hobby of mine.


I was somewhat of an early adopter to DVRs. But instead of getting the TIVO subscription service, I had Replay TV (the DVR which Hollywood eventually sued into bankruptcy for its ability to skip commercials. This was a great service until the satellite provider offered inexpensive DVRs as part of the package. It is surprising that TIVO still exists as a subscription service today,
but it seems that they offer more sophisticated data mining of viewing habits and allow for automatic recording nowadays.
but it seems that they offer more sophisticated data mining of viewing habits and allow for automatic recording nowadays.
HDTV greatly interested me as a consumer. But when it was first becoming commercially available, it was quite expensive and confusing. So I opted to get trained and sell televisions as a side job for a couple of weeks to better understand the marketplace. Most people either chose Plasmas or LCD TVs but I found that DLPs was more cost effective and had a better product for my situation. It has given me a larger Big Screen TV at a lower initial cost. I am not distressed that Mitsubishi has gotten out of the DLP TV consumer market since it has served my purposes and simple servicing (lightbulb replacement) can be self-installed.
When I first got a smartphone, I chose the Palm because I liked the potential synergy between the Palm Pilot PDA and a cellphone. The Palm Centro was a brick design but had a great tactile keyboard. I was tempted to get a Palm Pre but I observed that people had problems with the sliding keyboard design. So I advanced onto Android phones. Still I had high hopes for the WebOS, which looked like an elegant operating system. So much so, HP paid $1.2 billionfor Palm, seemingly just to get WebOS.
When tablets first came out, they started at $600 which was way too much for a Thrifty Techie. So I was happy to get my HP Touchpad at 1/3 of the price. HP tried pricing their WebOS tablet the same price-point as iPods so few sold. After 10 weeks of stagnant sales, HP decided to withdraw from the tablet marketplace and had a fire sales. Although logistics prevented me from buying a bottom of the barrel price, I was happy with what I paid. I knew that the OS was stillborn, but believed that it had enough apps to be useful. I termed that HP Touchpad tablet purchase as “turning into a torpedo”. Three years later, I am happily using the tablet. There are some challenges with not having new apps, but it still suits my purposes for quite a while.
It is interesting that several technology providers which I chose had brief market lives. But with the rapidity of change in technology and the planned obsolescence, one should not plan that any particular technology to be forever viable, no matter how well kept it is.
What this
techno retrospective has demonstrated is that this Thrifty Techie thinks
outside of the box when choosing technology based upon his utility
analysis. This Thifty Techie is an
inveterate bargain hunter but who knows that the lowest price is not always the
best bargain. By assessing features and
pairing them with desired abilities, he can determine when it is better to hold
onto a gadget or appreciate that one is sinking good money after bad on an
item.
May the
Thrifty-Techie.us help you discern what is the best choice for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment